Yes. The generated programs in the app intentionally start with a harder set (sometimes close to failure) and then move to sets with higher RIR.
This structure has several practical benefits, but two reasons tend to be the most important regarding the app.
1. It gives you a clearer RIR anchor
To get the best results from RIR-based programming, it helps to have a good sense of what failure actually feels like. Many people have not spent much time pushing sets to true failure or evaluating how close their working sets are to that point.
Without that reference point, it can be harder to judge what a true 2 RIR or 3 RIR feels like. Starting with a harder set helps establish that anchor so later RIR ratings are easier to estimate.
Note: When we refer to working sets, this assumes you have already completed your warm-ups. For larger compound movements, such as deadlifts or squats, warming up with lighter weights before your working sets is recommended.
2. It helps the app track effort and progress more effectively
This ties in with the first but Smart Progression relies on the performance data you log. If RIR estimates are consistently off, the recommendations that follow may also drift away from what would work best for you. That improves the quality of the data the app receives, which helps Smart Progression make better recommendations over time.
That said, this is not the only valid way to structure a workout. Current research does not suggest that placing a failure set first versus last meaningfully changes hypertrophy or strength outcomes, as long as overall effort and volume are similar.
Therefore, if this structure does not match your training preferences, you can adjust the RIR targets in your program and still benefit from Smart Progression.
Now that you understand why sets may start with lower RIR, you might enjoy one of these articles next:
What is RIR and How Should I Use it During Training?
How Can I Customize Periodization (RIR, reps, and sets) for Exercises in my Program?
